Amirteimoori, A. and A. Emrouznejad (2012). “On classifying inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis.” Applied Mathematics Letters

Amirteimoori, A. and A. Emrouznejad (2012). “On classifying inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis.” Applied Mathematics Letters



Download
(Source 1)
Download
(DOI)
Amirteimoori, A. and A. Emrouznejad (2012). “On classifying inputs and outputs in data envelopment analysis.” Applied Mathematics Letters .
Download
(Source 2)

Hatami-Marbini, A., M. Tavana, M. and A. Emrouznejad (2012). “Productivity Growth and Efficiency Measurements in Fuzzy Environments with an Application to Health Care.” International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications

Hatami-Marbini, A., M. Tavana, M. and A. Emrouznejad (2012). “Productivity Growth and Efficiency Measurements in Fuzzy Environments with an Application to Health Care.” International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications

Health care organizations must continuously improve their productivity to sustain long-term growth and profitability. Sustainable productivity performance is mostly assumed to be a natural outcome of successful health care management. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a popular mathematical programming method for comparing the inputs and outputs of a set of homogenous decision making units (DMUs) by evaluating their relative efficiency. The Malmquist productivity index (MPI) is widely used for productivity analysis by relying on constructing a best practice frontier and calculating the relative performance of a DMU for different time periods. The conventional DEA requires accurate and crisp data to calculate the MPI. However, the real-world data are often imprecise and vague. In this study, the authors propose a novel productivity measurement approach in fuzzy environments with MPI. An application of the proposed approach in health care is presented to demonstrate the simplicity and efficacy of the procedures and algorithms in a hospital efficiency study conducted for a State Office of Inspector General in the United States.

Download
(Source 1)
Download
(DOI)
Hatami-Marbini, A., M. Tavana, M. and A. Emrouznejad (2012). “Productivity Growth and Efficiency Measurements in Fuzzy Environments with an Application to Health Care.” International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications .
Download
(Source 2)

Emrouznejad, A., Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M., Hatami-Marbini, A. and Tavana, M. (2012). “General and Multiplicative Non-Parametric Corporate Performance Models with Interval Ratio Data.” Applied Mathematical Modelling

Emrouznejad, A., Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M., Hatami-Marbini, A. and Tavana, M. (2012). “General and Multiplicative Non-Parametric Corporate Performance Models with Interval Ratio Data.” Applied Mathematical Modelling

The increasing intensity of global competition has led organizations to utilize various types of performance measurement tools for improving the quality of their products and services. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a methodology for evaluating and measuring the relative efficiencies of a set of decision making units (DMUs) that use multiple inputs to produce multiple outputs. All the data in the conventional DEA with input and/or output ratios assumes the form of crisp numbers. However, the observed values of data in real-world problems are sometimes expressed as interval ratios. In this paper, we propose two new models: general and multiplicative non-parametric ratio models for DEA problems with interval data. The contributions of this paper are fourfold: (1) we consider input and output data expressed as interval ratios in DEA; (2) we address the gap in DEA literature for problems not suitable or difficult to model with crisp values; (3) we propose two new DEA models for evaluating the relative efficiencies of DMUs with interval ratios, and (4) we present a case study involving 20 banks with three interval ratios to demonstrate the applicability and efficacy of the proposed models where the traditional indicators are mostly financial ratios.

Download
(Source 1)
Download
(DOI)
Emrouznejad, A., Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, M., Hatami-Marbini, A. and Tavana, M. (2012). “General and Multiplicative Non-Parametric Corporate Performance Models with Interval Ratio Data.” Applied Mathematical Modelling .
Download
(Source 2)

Ho, W., A. Emrouznejad, T. He, C. K. Man Lee (2012). “Strategic logistics outsourcing: An integrated QFD and fuzzy AHP approach.” Expert Systems with Applications

Ho, W., A. Emrouznejad, T. He, C. K. Man Lee (2012). “Strategic logistics outsourcing: An integrated QFD and fuzzy AHP approach.” Expert Systems with Applications

This paper develops an integrated approach, combining quality function deployment (QFD), fuzzy set theory, and analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach, to evaluate and select the optimal third-party logistics service providers (3PLs). In the approach, multiple evaluating criteria are derived from the requirements of company stakeholders using a series of house of quality (HOQ). The importance of evaluating criteria is prioritized with respect to the degree of achieving the stakeholder requirements using fuzzy AHP. Based on the ranked criteria, alternative 3PLs are evaluated and compared with each other using fuzzy AHP again to make an optimal selection. The effectiveness of proposed approach is demonstrated by applying it to a Hong Kong based enterprise that supplies hard disk components. The proposed integrated approach outperforms the existing approaches because the outsourcing strategy and 3PLs selection are derived from the corporate/business strategy.

Download
(Source 1)
Download
(DOI)
Ho, W., A. Emrouznejad, T. He, C. K. Man Lee (2012). “Strategic logistics outsourcing: An integrated QFD and fuzzy AHP approach.” Expert Systems with Applications .
Download
(Source 2)

Emrouznejad, A., G. R. Amin (2012). “A new DEA model for technology selection in the presence of ordinal data.” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

Emrouznejad, A., G. R. Amin (2012). “A new DEA model for technology selection in the presence of ordinal data.” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology

This paper suggests a data envelopment analysis (DEA) model for selecting the most efficient alternative in advanced manufacturing technology in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data. The paper explains the problem of using an iterative method for finding the most efficient alternative and proposes a new DEA model without the need of solving a series of LPs. A numerical example illustrates the model, and an application in technology selection with multi-inputs/multi-outputs shows the usefulness of the proposed approach.

Download
(Source 1)
Download
(DOI)
Emrouznejad, A., G. R. Amin (2012). “A new DEA model for technology selection in the presence of ordinal data.” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology .
Download
(Source 2)

Zerafat Angiz L., M., A. Emrouznejad, Adli Mustafa and Joshua Ignatius (2012). “Type-2 TOPSIS: A group decision problem when ideal values are not extreme endpoints.” Group Decision and Negotiation

Zerafat Angiz L., M., A. Emrouznejad, Adli Mustafa and Joshua Ignatius (2012). “Type-2 TOPSIS: A group decision problem when ideal values are not extreme endpoints.” Group Decision and Negotiation

In the traditional TOPSIS, the ideal solutions are assumed to be located at the endpoints of the data interval. However, not all performance attributes possess ideal values at the endpoints. We termed performance attributes that have ideal values at extreme points as Type-1 attributes. Type-2 attributes however possess ideal values somewhere within the data interval instead of being at the extreme end points. This provides a preference ranking problem when all attributes are computed and assumed to be of the Type-1 nature. To overcome this issue, we propose a new Fuzzy DEA method for computing the ideal values and distance function of Type-2 attributes in a TOPSIS methodology. Our method allows Type-1 and Type-2 attributes to be included in an evaluation system without compromising the ranking quality. The efficacy of the proposed model is illustrated with a vendor evaluation case for a high-tech investment decision making exercise. A comparison analysis with the traditional TOPSIS is also presented.

Download
(Source 1)
Download
(DOI)
Zerafat Angiz L., M., A. Emrouznejad, Adli Mustafa and Joshua Ignatius (2012). “Type-2 TOPSIS: A group decision problem when ideal values are not extreme endpoints.” Group Decision and Negotiation .
Download
(Source 2)

Giraleas, D. , A. Emrouznejad, E. Thanassoulis (2012) “Productivity change using growth accounting and frontier-based approaches – Evidence from a Monte Carlo analysis.” European Journal of Operational Research

Giraleas, D. , A. Emrouznejad, E. Thanassoulis (2012) “Productivity change using growth accounting and frontier-based approaches – Evidence from a Monte Carlo analysis.” European Journal of Operational Research

This study presents some quantitative evidence from a number of simulation experiments on the accuracy of the productivity growth estimates derived from growth accounting (GA) and frontier-based methods (namely data envelopment analysis-, corrected ordinary least squares-, and stochastic frontier analysis-based malmquist indices) under various conditions. These include the presence of technical inefficiency, measurement error, misspecification of the production function (for the GA and parametric approaches) and increased input and price volatility from one period to the next. The study finds that the frontier-based methods usually outperform GA, but the overall performance varies by experiment. Parametric approaches generally perform best when there is no functional form misspecification, but their accuracy greatly diminishes otherwise. The results also show that the deterministic approaches perform adequately even under conditions of (modest) measurement error and when measurement error becomes larger, the accuracy of all approaches (including stochastic approaches) deteriorates rapidly, to the point that their estimates could be considered unreliable for policy purposes.

Download
(Source 1)
Download
(DOI)
Giraleas, D. , A. Emrouznejad, E. Thanassoulis (2012) “Productivity change using growth accounting and frontier-based approaches – Evidence from a Monte Carlo analysis.” European Journal of Operational Research .
Download
(Source 2)

13th European Workshop on Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (EWEPA”13), 17-20 June 2013, Helsinki, Finland

The 13th European Workshop on Efficiency and Productivity Analysis (EWEPA”13) will take place on 17-20 June 2013 at Aalto University School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland. The first conference day 17 June will be reserved for pre-conference workshops. All plenary and parallel sessions are scheduled on 18-20 June.

Empirical and theoretical papers on productivity, production theory and efficiency analysis in economics, management science, operations research, public administration and related fields are invited. Historically, empirical papers have addressed such general topics as education, health, energy, finance, agriculture, transportation, utilities, and economic development, among many others. The deadline for submissions is February 15, 2013. Authors will be notified on the status of their abstract no later than March 15. The paper submission system and further instructions will be posted in due course on the conference website.

For further details please visit:

I look forward to seeing you in Helsinki next year!

Kind regards,

Timo Kuosmanen
General chair of the local organizing committee

4th Workshop on Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, 29th October, 2012, Porto, Portugal

4th Workshop on Efficiency and Productivity Analysis Efficiency in the Health Sector
29th October, 2012
Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua Diogo Botelho, 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal

Organised by:
Maria Conceição Silva Portela and Sofia Nogueira da Silva (Faculty of Economics and
Management of UCP) (csilva@porto.ucp.pt)
Ana S. Camanho and Ricardo Castro (Faculty of Engineering of the University of
Porto) (acamanho@fe.up.pt)

Sponsored by: Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT)

For details please visit http://www.porto.ucp.pt/feg/docentes/csilva/workshop/index.html

Professor William W. Cooper passed away early in the morning on Wednesday, June 20, 2012

William W. Cooper

Professor William W. Cooper

I am deeply saddened to report that Professor William W. Cooper passed away early in the morning on Wednesday, June 20. He was a giant in the fields of operations research, management science and economics — and, especially in Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) that spans all those disciplines. He had a great life making so many important contribution to so many fields, and of course he was the father of DEA. In a sense, an entire era ends with Bill Cooper, but he will be remembered for a long time because his intellectual ingenuity will continue to breed new knowledge in those that follow him. For those of us fortunate to have known him over the years it will leave a huge void in our lives. He was always so generous with his time and so full of new insights. Many have benefited enormously from Bill’s munificence manifested in his personal attention and initiative in not taking no for an answer and sometimes making the impossible possible.

Born on July 23, 1914, Bill Cooper grew up in one of the roughest neighborhoods of Chicago. During the tumultuous times of the Great Depression in the 1930s, the responsibility for supporting his family fell on young Bill’s shoulders. He dropped out of high school to earn a living as a prizefighter boxer, losing only three of his 63 professional bouts. His career as a prizefighter, however, instilled in Bill the qualities of persistence and determination that enabled him to accomplish many challenging objectives in his academic life. Continuing on to studies at University of Chicago and Columbia University, Bill learned to settle arguments with incisive arguments rather than with his fists, and he was equally effective.

Throughout his career, Bill Cooper espoused the need for problem-driven research. He recognized the need for management researchers to be closely connected with the problems faced by managers in contemporary organizations. To Bill, this did not imply simply applying existing models to solve problems that fit those models. Rather, the objective is to identify new and challenging problems that require original solutions, motivating new basic research and the development of new models to address these problems observed in the field. Such research not only results in improvements in existing management practice but it also substantially enriches intellectual inquiry with the introduction of new problems, models and solution methods to the research literature. This is a tradition that has guided us in DEA research ever since its inception and led to its development as a rigorous method that is useful for addressing so many management and policy problems.

Rajiv D. Banker